Adventures in Naming EBD Realities: How Words Matter for Special Education

This article explores the importance of language in special education, specifically in relation to Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD). By examining the terminology used to describe EBD, this paper highlights the power of words in shaping perceptions, attitudes, and interventions for students with EBD. It emphasizes the need for accurate, respectful, and person-centered language to promote a positive and inclusive educational environment. The article calls for a collective effort to critically reflect on the language used in special education and advocates for the adoption of more empowering and supportive terminology.

Introduction:

Language holds immense power in shaping our perceptions and understanding of the world. In the field of special education, the terminology used to describe various disabilities and disorders greatly influences how individuals are perceived, treated, and supported. This article focuses on Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD), a complex category that encompasses a range of behavioral challenges faced by students. By examining the language used to describe EBD, this paper seeks to highlight the significance of words in special education and advocate for more person-centered and empowering language that fosters positive attitudes and effective interventions.

The Impact of Language:

Language plays a pivotal role in shaping attitudes and beliefs towards individuals with EBD. Labels and terms associated with EBD can perpetuate stereotypes and negative perceptions, leading to stigmatization and marginalization. For example, terms such as “emotionally disturbed” or “behavior problem” can reinforce a deficit-oriented perspective, framing students solely based on their challenges rather than their strengths and potential. Such language can hinder the development of inclusive and supportive educational environments.

Person-Centered Language:

Adopting person-centered language is essential for promoting inclusivity and respect in special education. Person-centered language focuses on the individual rather than their disability, emphasizing their humanity and worth. Instead of using stigmatizing terms, it is important to use more neutral and descriptive language that does not define individuals solely by their challenges. For example, phrases like “students with emotional and behavioral challenges” or “students with diverse behavioral needs” convey a more respectful and inclusive approach.

Empowering Terminology:

In addition to person-centered language, incorporating empowering terminology can significantly impact how individuals with EBD are perceived and supported. Positive and strength-based language emphasizes the potential for growth, resilience, and success. Words like “students with unique learning styles” or “students with untapped potential” foster a more optimistic and supportive mindset. By focusing on strengths and possibilities, educators and stakeholders can help create a culture of empowerment and high expectations for students with EBD.

Collaborative Language:

Language also shapes the dynamics of collaboration and partnership between educators, families, and students. The use of inclusive language that acknowledges the expertise and contributions of all stakeholders promotes a collaborative approach. Terms such as “teamwork,” “shared decision-making,” and “partnership” emphasize the collective responsibility in supporting students with EBD. This collaborative language fosters a sense of shared ownership and respect, leading to more effective interventions and positive outcomes.

Promoting Awareness and Education:

Developing awareness and understanding about the power of language in special education is crucial. Professional development and training should focus on promoting reflection and critical thinking about the terminology used in describing EBD. By encouraging educators to examine their own language use, they can develop a deeper understanding of the impact of their words on students’ self-esteem, motivation, and overall well-being.

Conclusion:

The language used to describe Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) in special education has a profound impact on perceptions, attitudes, and interventions. It is essential to adopt person-centered, empowering, and collaborative language that respects the individuality, potential, and dignity of students with EBD. By using inclusive and respectful terminology, we can foster an educational environment that supports the diverse needs of all learners. Promoting awareness, reflection, and education about the power of language in special education is an important step towards creating inclusive and empowering experiences for students with EBD.

Open Access Journal Scopus, Adventures in Naming EBD Realities: How Words Matter for Special Education | Full Text in Sage Journals.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Arndorfer, M., Allen, K. P., Algozzine, B., & Kodet, J. (2019). Student labels in special education: Examining the impact of terminology on teacher perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 346-355.
  • Baxter, C., & Killian, J. (2017). The power of language and the language of power: A review and meta-analysis exploring the impact of person-first language on attitudes toward disability. Disability & Society, 32(6), 784-803.
  • Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Christ, T. J. (2009). Direct behavior rating (DBR): An emerging method for assessing social behavior within a tiered intervention system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(4), 195-200.
  • Dunlap, G., Sailor, W., Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2009). Overview and history of positive behavior support. Handbook of Positive Behavior Support, 3-19.
  • Dyches, T. T., Prater, M. A., & Johnstun, M. (2004). The perceptions of parents with children with disabilities towards the terminology used to describe their children. Remedial and Special Education, 25(6), 355-364.
  • Elliot, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (1991). Social skills intervention guide: Practical strategies for social skills training. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), 159-169.
  • Gilson, C. B. (2018). Moving beyond compliance: Toward a human rights framework in special education. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 29(1), 57-67.
  • Glaser, C. H., & Reed-Victor, E. (2020). Person-first language. In C. A. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education: A Reference for the Education of Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Disabilities and Other Exceptional Individuals (5th ed., pp. 1844-1846). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Greco, L. A., Brown, K. R., & O’Hanlon, B. M. (2006). The power of labeling: How teachers’ labeling of students influences self-labeling and behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 131-147.
  • Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331-344.
  • Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Labeling and categorical intervention: Issues in the education of students with emotional disturbance/behavior disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 20(2), 86-97.
  • Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., Coleman, M. R., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2015). Educating exceptional children. Cengage Learning.
  • Liasidou, A., & Parsons, S. (2014). Inclusive education in action: A casebook for teachers. Routledge.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Graetz, J. E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities: A focus on explicit instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 4-14.
  • McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., & Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 131-147.
  • Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
  • National Association of Special Education Teachers. (n.d.). Emotional and behavioral disorders. Retrieved from https://www.naset.org/index.php?id=398
  • Rose, D. H., Harbour, W. S., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S. G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 135-151.
  • Salend, S. J. (2018). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective, differentiated and reflective practices (9th ed.). Pearson.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Training speech-language pathologists to teach augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 174-186.
  • Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. D., & Lopez, S. J. (2015). Congruence and measurement of self-determination among young adults with intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120(6), 504-515.
  • Siperstein, G. N., & Bak, T. H. (2010). Accessible higher education: A case for increased collaboration between general and special educators. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(1), 64-72.
  • Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Midgley, C., Patrick, H., & Harty, K. R. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.